2 min read

Skills4Good CEO Gets Published in AJOB Neuroscience Journal

Featured Image

We’re delighted to announce that Skills4Good CEO & Co-Founder Josephine Yam’s AI ethics paper “Is There an App for That?: Ethical Issues in the Digital Mental Health Response to COVID-19” was published in the prestigious peer-reviewed journal, American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB) Neuroscience.

She co-authored the paper with Prof. Joshua Skorburg, who is Co-Director, Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical AI (CARE-AI) and Philosophy Professor at the University of Guelph.

Josephine graduated from Stanford University Graduate School of Business’ Executive Program. She recently obtained her Master of Arts in Philosophy degree specializing in AI Ethics at the University of Guelph. Her AI Ethics degree strategically complements her Master of Laws degree that she obtained at the University of Calgary.

As an AI lawyer, AI ethicist and tech entrepreneur, Josephine leads Skills4Good AI in helping organizations achieve compliance, accountability & Responsible AI. Her online course “Intro to AI and Human Rights” is one of the three courses of the Skills4Good Responsible AI Program.


“Well before COVID-19, there was growing excitement about the potential of various digital technologies such as tele-health, smartphone apps, or AI chatbots to revolutionize mental healthcare. As the SARS-CoV-2 virus spread across the globe, clinicians warned of the mental illness epidemic within the coronavirus pandemic. Now, funding for digital mental health technologies is surging and many researchers are calling for widespread adoption to address the mental health sequelae of COVID-19. Reckoning with the ethical implications of these technologies is urgent because decisions made today will shape the future of mental health research and care for the foreseeable future. We contend that the most pressing ethical issues concern (1) the extent to which these technologies demonstrably improve mental health outcomes and (2) the likelihood that wide-scale adoption will exacerbate the existing health inequalities laid bare by the pandemic. We argue that the evidence for efficacy is weak and that the likelihood of increasing inequalities is high. First, we review recent trends in digital mental health. Next, we turn to the clinical literature to show that many technologies proposed as a response to COVID-19 are unlikely to improve outcomes. Then, we argue that even evidence-based technologies run the risk of increasing health disparities. We conclude by suggesting that policymakers should not allocate limited resources to the development of many digital mental health tools and should focus instead on evidence-based solutions to address mental health inequalities.”

You can access the paper at this link: https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2021.1918284